🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish laws and support services to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could possibly send back the bill for additional review if he holds concerns.

President the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in several EU countries
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could influence comparable debates in additional EU countries